There are two types of written plans, which must be developed and implemented by public schools regarding students with disabilities. First, students with disabilities requiring only reasonable accommodation must have a written plan under Section 504; this is commonly referred to as a 504 plan. Each public school should have a person (usually an assistant principal or a guidance counselor, but not a special educator) who serves as the school's "504 coordinator." This person should coordinate the development, maintenance, and implementation of 504 plans.
504 plans should be developed by a committee, consisting of the student with a disability (if appropriate), the student's parent(s)/guardian(s), the student's teacher(s), the student's counselor, and the 504 coordinator.
Additionally, special educators often serve as advisors to 504 committees. The student's disability and corresponding need for reasonable accommodation are identified and documented in the plan. Likewise, the plan delineates the specific accommodations, which will be implemented by the school. All school staff involved in the provision of accommodations should be contacted by the 504 coordinator and made aware of their duties and responsibilities. The plan itself should be updated at least annually.
For students with disabilities who require specialized instruction, the IDEA controls the procedural requirements. The IDEA process is more involved than that required under Section 504. Instruction and accommodation under the IDEA are provided in accord with a plan called an Individualized Education Program, known as an IEP. A student's IEP is a legal document which, in part, sets forth the duties and responsibilities of the school district and staff regarding that student. It is the responsibility of special educators, regular education teachers, administrators, counselors, and other professional educators to be thoroughly familiar with the provisions of the IEP for EACH of their students with disabilities.
The remainder of this document sets forth the general procedural information that regular educators should know about the IEP/IDEA process. REMEMBER: Be safe. Seek the advice of special educators. Whether you are a teacher, an administrator, or a counselor, you will save yourself considerable time and trouble -- and you will do a much better job for your students with disabilities -- if you learn to appreciate these specialists as a valuable resource.
Schools and educators have a legal duty to identify students with disabilities. This can be relatively simple in the case of obvious physical disabilities. However, disabilities are not always obvious. Educators are under a duty to recognize the possible presence of disabilities based on student academic performance as well as student performance in non-academic school activities.
Once an educator identifies a concern regarding the performance of a particular student, a period of intervention begins. The educator should implement appropriate intervention strategies aimed at alleviating the identified concerns. The educator should document the concerns and subsequent interventions. The key issue is whether the strategies enable the student to benefit from the regular education curriculum.
The educator must refer the student for further consideration if either of two situations exists:
In either case, educators should make a written referral to the 504 coordinator (or to the committee established in the school to deal with disability referrals).
Note: An initial referral is usually NOT an IDEA matter. Special Educators may advise or assist the 504 committee or coordinator, but a full 504 consideration should take place before referring the matter for special education. Consideration under Section 504 should remain separate and distinct from the realm of special education. This is because it is inappropriate to implement IDEA procedures until it becomes evident that the student has a need that exceeds reasonable accommodation. Thus, until it is suspected that specialized instruction is required, it is inappropriate to bring students under the auspices of special education.
When a case is referred, the 504 coordinator should call a meeting of the 504 team. The team should review the documentation provided regarding the concerns about the student and the interventions that have been attempted. The team should decide upon what additional intervention and evaluation is appropriate.
Over a period of several weeks, the team should closely monitor and the information it obtains regarding the student's performance and the effectiveness of the methods implemented to assist the student. It is important to remember that student performance is a function of a variety of factors. Sometimes the particular methods employed by the student's teacher are simply not effective with regard to the student. Other times, poor student performance can be a result of diet, family issues, abuse, or a number of other factors having nothing to do with school or with disability. It is the responsibility of the 504 committee to address these issues and determine the real nature of the problem.
Finally, after a period that should in most cases be not less than six weeks and should involve no less than three meetings of the full committee to evaluate the progress of the matter, the 504 committee will determine three things:
As soon as a case is referred to special education, the matter comes under the control of the IDEA. At this time, a special educator becomes the "case manager" and an IEP Team is formed. From this time forward, all decisions regarding the student's needs educational program are made by the IEP Team; school personnel is specifically prohibited from making such decisions without the Team. The IDEA provides that the IEP Team consists of:
Note that as a regular educator you are legally required to attend meetings of the IEP Team. (However, on the middle school and high school level -- where students have several regular education teachers -- it is often the practice to rotate IEP Team duties among the various teachers. The IDEA requirement is seen as being aimed at assuring that the Team have access to a regular education perspective, not as being aimed at requiring the presence of six or seven regular education teachers at every high school IEP Team meeting.)
The case manager gives the IEP Team members notice and the first meeting is held. The first order of business is deciding whether the matter is properly before the Team. If the Team thinks that the matter should go back to the 504 committee, it can send the case back. Otherwise, the Team decides what type of evaluation is necessary in order to determine the existence of a disability and what, if any, need exists for specialized instruction.
After the evaluation is completed, the Team is reconvened. At this time, the Team reviews the results of the evaluation. The team looks at whether the results meet the state and federal criteria for the existence of a disability under the IDEA and whether the student requires specialized instruction. If so, the student is considered eligible for special education.
If the Team decides that the student is eligible, the Team must then design the student's educational program. The Team determines the student's needs regarding specialized instruction, as well as the need for any related services (such as transportation, speech/language therapy, health services, audiology, occupational or physical therapy, adaptive equipment, interpreters, orientation and/or mobility counseling, etc.) Likewise, the Team identifies any necessary accommodations or modifications that are required in order for the student to be able to participate in and benefit from regular education settings, curricula, or activities. These items, as well a statement of the student's current level of educational performance, are documented in the IEP.
As stated above, the IEP is an important formal legal document. The professional educators and other service providers who deal with the student must be informed of the contents of the IEP as such contents relate to student performance and needs. The program established by the IEP must be fully and immediately implemented by the district. Regular educators must be sure to remain familiar with the contents of their students' IEP's and must also be sure to implement the required instruction and accommodations/modifications contained therein. Failure to do so can result in the educator being personally liable.
IEP implementation and the student progress in accord with the IEP should be monitored continuously throughout the year. Reporting on student progress towards IEP goals and objectives is required to be completed on the same schedule as such reporting for non-disabled students. In other words, if report cards come out four times per year, then reports of student progress towards IEP goals and objectives should be provided at the same times.
The IEP must be reviewed annually. The IEP Team must meet prior to the expiration date (which is one year from the IEP's implementation) and develop a new IEP in accord with the student's progress and needs as exhibited over the year. Likewise, the formal evaluation process must be reviewed to determine whether the student remains eligible for special education and, if so, to identify the student's educational needs. The review of the evaluation is done every three years. The IEP Team has the option to forgo a new formal evaluation if it feels that there has been no change in the student's eligibility. However, a formal meeting is still required.
The law recognizes that students with disabilities, whether receiving special education or receiving only reasonable accommodation, should not be removed from school for infractions which are manifestations of their disabilities. Consider two examples:
The IDEA sets forth specific procedural requirements for disciplinary actions involving removal from school. Note that this requirement has the potential to create confusion in that the Team may be inclined to make a judgment regarding the facts (i.e., whether the alleged behavior occurred) instead of limiting its judgment to whether the behavior, if it did occur, is a manifestation of the disability. Also note that even if the behavior is not a manifestation of the students disability (and the student is therefore suspended or expelled) the school district must continue to provide services to the student. If the student cannot come to school, then the district must provide a home tutor, or provide services in another setting. As with all other decisions regarding services to students with IEP's, the alternative educational setting must be determined by the IEP Team.
The IDEA requires that beginning at age 14, IEP's incorporate the various goals and objectives applicable to student needs regarding transition from high school to post-high school life. Regular educators in middle school and high school should therefore be aware that IEP's will contain such goals and that the education of students with IEP's on these grade levels will involve requirements, curricula, and activities which go beyond the regular education curriculum.
Arguably the most important skill for students with disabilities to acquire is that of self-advocacy. This involves knowledge of one's rights and the skills necessary to assure enforcement of those rights. Regular educators should remain aware that self-advocacy training is an important part of specialized instruction. Remember that students are in the process of learning these skills; they are not masters of these skills. As such, be helpful to students with disabilities; encourage their efforts to enforce the modifications/accommodations to which they are entitled. As students learn to use self-advocacy skills, they may initially use these skills in an unrefined or harsh manner. Try not to be insulted or become defensive when students attempt to enforce their rights as persons with disabilities. Remember that these students must learn to identify and enforce their rights and that they had better learn this by the time they graduate.